In this paper we analyze the relationship between the perception of income as satisfying household needs and saving rate of this household. Using the multinomial logit regression function we measure the probability of a household to fall into one of the groups categorized by the subjective perception of income in relation to the current household disposable income. The variable specified for the valuation of income is income perception, defined as a class of observed disposable income located on the scale of the subjectively satisfying income. Factors determining the perception of income are: gender and education of the household head, family characteristics, source of income and place of residence. The analysis of relations between the income perception and the household saving rates shows that the perception of income affects both the household observed and predicted saving rates. The research is based on the Household Budget Surveys data for Poland in 2008.

Full text: PDF


household, income, needs, valuation, saving, probability

JEL Codes

D31, D14,


Akerlof, G.A., 2002, Behavioral Macroeconomics and Microeconomic Behavior, The American Economic Review, Vol. 92, No. 3, 2002, pp. 411-433.

Akerlof, G.A, Kranton R.E., 2010, Identity Economics: How Our Identities Shape Our Work, Wages, and Well-Being, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

Campbell, A.J, 1976, Converse P., E., Rodgers W., The Quality of American Life, Rusell Sage Foundation, New York.

Clark, A.E., Oswald, A.J., 1996, Satisfaction and Comparison Income, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 61, No. 3, pp. 359-381.

Duesenberry, J.S., 1949, Income, Saving and the Theory of Consumer Behavior, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Easterlin, R. A., 2006, Life Cycle Happiness and Its Sources. Intersections of Psychology, Economics and Demography, Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 463-482.

Gucwa-Lesny, E., 2005, Building Knowledge Based Society on the Basis of Mostly Individual Resources, in: Karl Riegel ed., Absurdity in the Economy, International Association for Research in Economic Psychology Congress, Prague.

Household Budget Surveys, 2008, Central Statistical Office, Warsaw, Poland.

Kahneman, D., 2002, Maps of Bounded Rationality: a Perspective on Intuitive Judgment and Choice, Nobel Prize Lecture, December 8.

Katona G., 1951, Psychological Analysis of Economic Behavior, McGraw-Hill, New York.

Kot, S. M., 1993, Cardinal Utility Functions in Welfare Comparisons: Measuring and Modeling, Discussion Papers, 93-4, Bilkent University, Ankara.

Kot, S. M., 2000, Ekonometryczne modele dobrobytu, PWN, Warszawa – Krakow.

Liberda B., 2007, Income Preferences and Household Savings, Gospodarka Narodowa, Vol. XXIII, No. 9, pp. 19-30.

Liberda, B., Pęczkowski M., 2007, Factors Determining Income Valuation by Households, in: Values and Economy, eds. M. Polič, B. Bajec, L. Komidar, pp. 163-172, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Litwin D., Sapir E.V., 2009, Perceived Income Adequacy among Older Adults in 12 Countries: Findings from the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe, The Gerontologist, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 397-406.

McFadden, D., 1974, Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behaviour. In: Frontiers in Econometrics, Zarembka, P., ed., pp. 105-142, Academic Press, New York.

Michalos, A., C., 1991, Global Report on Student Well-Being, Springer-Verlag, New York.

Pęczkowski, M., 2006, Desired and Real Income of Polish Households, Congress of International Association for Research in Economic Psychology (IAREP) and Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics (SABE), Paris.

Stanovnik, T., 1992, Perception of Poverty and Income Satisfaction – an Empirical Analysis of Slovene Households, Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 57-69.

Stata 11 Base Reference Manual Set, 2010.

Van Praag, B.M.S. 1991, Ordinal and cardinal utility: an integration of the two dimensions of the welfare concept, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 50, No. 1-2, pp. 69-89.