INFLUENCE OF RULES FOR COMPUTING CORPORATE INCOME TAX ON THE ACCURACY OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LITHUANIAN COMPANIES

Gintaras Cernius, Liucija Birskyte, Arturas Balkevicius

Abstract


Companies in Lithuania have to follow Business Accounting Standards (BAS) when preparing their financial statements. Recording financial transactions according to BAS ensures that the information a company shares with potential lenders and investors gives a true and fair view of its business situation. However, the tax law prescribes its own set of accounting rules, which can result in a difference between what a business shows in financial statements and what it reports on its tax returns. This paper examines whether Lithuanian companies predominantly use tax accounting principles that migrate into their financial statements to create an inaccurate picture of business performance. The method of experts’ evaluation was chosen for that purpose. The results indicate that Lithuanian companies tend to heavily rely on accounting principles prescribed in corporate income tax law thus distorting information contained in financial statements. The paper contributes to the scarce literature on this issue of high relevance to both academics and practitioners.


Full text: PDF

Keyword(s)


accounting principles, financial statements, corporate income tax, Lithuanian companies

JEL Codes


M41, M4, H32

References


Aboody, D., Barth, M. and Kasznik, R., 1999. Revaluations of fixed assets and future firm performance: evidence from the UK. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 26, pp.149–178. Doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(98)00040-8

Amir, E., Kirschenheiter, M. and Willard, K., 1997. The valuation of deferred taxes. Contemporary Accounting Research, 14, pp. 597–622. DOI: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1997.tb00543.x

Barth, M. and Clinch, G., 1998. Revalued financial, tangible, and intangible assets: associations with share prices and non-market-based value estimates. Journal of Accounting Research, 36, pp.199–233. DOI: 10.2307/2491314

Barth, M., 2000. Valuation-based accounting research: implications for financial reporting and opportunities for future research. Accounting and Finance, 40 (1), pp. 7–31. DOI: 10.1111/1467-629X.00033

Beaver, W.H. and Dukes, R.E., 1972. Interperiod tax allocation, earnings expectations and the behavior of security prices. The Accounting Review, 47, pp. 320–332.

Business accounting standard 9. 2004. Valstybės žinios [Official Gazette], No. 20-616.

Business accounting standard 24. 2004. Valstybės žinios [Official Gazette], No. 180-6695.

Chaney, P., and Jeter, D., 1994. The effect of deferred taxes on security prices. Journal of Accounting Audit and Finance, 9, 91–116. Doi: 10.1177/0148558X9400900106

Chang, C., Herbohn, K. and Tutticci, I., 2009. Market’s perception of deferred tax accruals. Accounting and Finance, 49, 645–673.DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-629X.2009.00307.

Chludek, A., 2011. Perceived versus actual cash flow implications of deferred taxes-an analysis of value relevance and reversal under IFRS. Journal of International Accounting Research, 10, 1–25. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/jiar.2011.10.1.1

Citron, D., 2001. The valuation of deferred taxation: evidence from the UK partial provision approach. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 28, 821–852.DOI: 10.1111/1468-5957.00395

Colley, R., Rue, J. and Volkan, A., 2006. The myth of inter-period allocation of deferred taxes: industry-based analyses. Journal of American Academy of Business. Cambridge, 8 (2), pp.1-8.

Dhaliwal, D., Kaplan, S., Laux, R. And Weisbrod, E., 2013. The information content of tax expense for firms reporting losses. Journal of Accounting Research, 51, pp.135–164. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2012.00466.x

Graham, J., Raedy, J. and Shakelford, D., 2012. Research in accounting for income taxes. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53, pp.412–434. doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.11.006

Guenther, D. and Sansing, R., 2000. Valuation of the firm in the presence of temporary book-tax differences: the role of deferred tax assets and liabilities. Accounting Review, 75, pp.1–12. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/accr.2000.75.1.1

Guenther, D. and Sansing, R., 2004. The valuation relevance of reversing deferred tax liabilities. Accounting Review, 79, pp.437–451. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/accr.2004.79.2.437

Hanlon, D., Navissi, F. and Soepriyanto, G., 2014. The value relevance of deferred tax attributed to asset revaluations. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 10(2), pp. 87-99. doi:10.1016/j.jcae.2014.03.001

Hennig, C.J., Raabe, W.A. and Everett, J.O., 2010. Case studies for book-tax differences in the classroom. The Tax Adviser, 41 (8), pp.568–573.

Hennig, C. J., Mautz R. D. J. and Evans, A. L. 2013. Dealingwith Schedule UTP disclosure requirements: Tips for Small and Medium-Sized Entities. The CPA Journal, 83(8), (August2013): pp.40-45.

Kubota, K. and Takehara, H., 2010. Effects of tax rate cut on firms' profitability and valuation: a micro foundations approach. Proceedings of the Northeast Business and Economics Association, pp.55-58.

Laux, R.C., 2013. The association between deferred tax assets and liabilities and future tax payments. The Accounting Review, 88(4), pp.1357-1383. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/accr-50417

Lynn, S., Seethamraju, C. and Seetharaman, A., 2008. Incremental value relevance of unrecognized deferred taxes: evidence from the United Kingdom J Am Tax Assoc, 30, pp. 107–130. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/jata.2008.30.2.107

Raskolnikov, A., 2008. Relational tax planning under risk-based rules. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 156(5), pp. 1181-1262. DOI: 10.2307/40041405

Rudzkiene, V., 2005. Social Statistics. Vilnius: Mykolas Romeris University Publication Centre. ISBN 9955190027.

Rudzkiene, V and Augustinaitis, A., 2009. Guidelines for E-Government in Lithuania: Insights for the Future. Vilnius: Publication Centre of Mykolas Romeris University. 350 p., ISBN 9789955191605.

Sonnier, B.M., Henning, C.V.J., Everett, J.O. and Raabe, W.A., 2012. Reporting of book-tax differences for financial and tax purposes: a case study. Journal of Accounting Education, 30(1), pp.58-79. doi:10.1016/j.jaccedu.2012.06.009

Taylor, G. and Richardson, G., 2012. International corporate tax avoidance practices: evidence from Australian firms. The International Journal of Accounting, 47(4), pp.469-496. doi:10.1016/j.intacc.2012.10.004

Tidikis, R., 2003. Research methods for social sciences. Vilnius: Lithuanian Law Institute. 626 p. ISBN 9955563265.

Wong, J., Wong, N. and Naiker, V., 2011. Comprehensive versus partial deferred tax liabilities and equity market values. Accounting and Finance, 51(4), pp.1087-1106. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467